Discussion guide

Choose your audience

The framing copy and discussion questions will adjust to fit who you're walking through this lesson with.

Christwise · Discussion guide · Small group

Did Christianity Copy Pagan Myths?

Are the Gospels just another rehash of dying-and-rising god stories?

15 min lesson · beginner Common Objections Last reviewed April 26, 2026

How to use this guide

This guide is built for a 45-60 minute small-group conversation about "Did Christianity Copy Pagan Myths?." Open with prayer, read the framing aloud, and use the questions below to surface what people actually think before you walk through the case. Aim for honest engagement over consensus.

Facilitator tips

  • Read the lesson before the meeting; you do not need to be an expert, just a guide.
  • Resist the urge to fill silence. The best discussions follow long pauses.
  • When someone raises an objection you cannot answer, write it down and follow up next week.
  • Close with a single takeaway from each member, not a doctrinal summary.

What we're studying

This claim circulates widely online (Horus, Mithras, Dionysus parallels). It often relies on outdated or secondhand sources and deserves a careful look.

The case in brief

When we examine the actual primary sources for Mithras, Horus, Osiris, Dionysus, and others, the detailed parallels asserted in popular works (virgin birth, twelve disciples, crucifixion at sunrise, three-day resurrection) turn out to be invented, exaggerated, or drawn from Christian-influenced later traditions. Early Christianity is rooted in a specifically Jewish monotheistic context hostile to pagan syncretism.

Argument structure

Conclusion: Christianity did not arise by copying pagan myths.

Premises
  • Popular parallels (Horus, Mithras) are not found in the primary sources.
  • Early Christianity is rooted in strict Jewish monotheism.
  • The Gospels present named people, places, and dates, not timeless myth.

What if someone says...

Common objections and responses
Objection 1

"But there are some broad similarities across myths."

Response

Broad motifs like death or vegetation cycles are common in religions, but the specific, historically located claims of the Gospels (named witnesses, named Roman officials, datable events) belong to a different genre than mythic allegory.

Objection 2

"Paul was Hellenized and borrowed mystery religion language."

Response

Paul's categories (kingdom, Messiah, resurrection of the dead, new creation) are drawn from Second Temple Judaism, not from mystery cults. His letters repeatedly set Christian claims against idolatry.

Discussion questions

  1. When you read a parallel claim online, what primary source should you look for?
  2. How would you decide whether two stories share a common origin?
  3. [Small group] Where in your own life does this question feel most pressing?
  4. [Small group] Who do you know that wrestles with this — and how could you talk with them about it this week?

Going deeper

Primary texts and key works behind the lesson
  • The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach
    Michael Licona · 2010 · Resurrection
  • The Case for Christ
    Lee Strobel · 1998 · Evidential apologetics
  • 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 (early creed)
    Paul of Tarsus · c. AD 53-55 · Pauline Epistles

Notes

Space for what came up in your conversation

Christwise · christwise.org/lesson/pagan-myths · Discussion guide · Small group / Bible study

Use freely for ministry, classroom, and family contexts. Cite specific historical claims to the named scholars in the bibliography.